Three Keys to Successfully Handling Difficult Conversations with Employees

shutterstock_446643151
Reading Time: 3 minutes

People managers rarely become great leaders without the ability to handle tough conversations well.  A leader’s ability to successfully handle difficult conversations with employees is imperative.  All parties (the employee, the organization, and the leader) benefit when such conversations are handled constructively.

Step #1: INTENT 

Intent is of paramount importance.  One must approach difficult conversations with employees with a caring and helpful intent.  If a leader goes into a difficult conversation “looking for a pound of flesh,” the likelihood of the meeting going well is greatly diminished.  Remember, words represent only 20% of our communication.  The other 80% consists of body language, tonality, and other micro-behaviors that signal our true feelings.  Don’t walk into a difficult conversation until your intent is that of a helpful and caring leader.  I’m not saying this mindset is easy to achieve.  However, I am saying this mindset is enormously important.

Step #2: SEPARATING THE PERSON FROM THE BEHAVIOR 

As leaders, regardless of industry, our priority should be the protection, safety and motivation of our employees.  We should strive to keep them motivated and energized.  As a sales leader specifically, I want my sales folks to believe they can run through brick walls.  I want them highly motivated, highly confident and highly engaged.  It is therefore critically important that we never tear down our employees.  Instead, we must strive to continually build them up.  We must do our very best to instill a high level of confidence and capability within them.

It is important not to intentionally damage, lower or degrade a person’s confidence, motivation or self-worth.  But how does a leader ensure they won’t damage the employee when entering into a difficult conversation?  This can be accomplished by separating the person from their behavior.  You see, in difficult conversations we are simply trying to correct behaviors and performance.  We’re never trying to change or correct the individual – the person.  That would be crazy, as it is very difficult, if not impossible to change an individual.  We can only hope to change a specific behavior or performance level.

Let’s look at a quick example: Bill is not meeting his sales number for the third quarter in a row.  It’s time to have a difficult conversation with Bill.  Once we ensure our intent is “right,” we then begin the process of separating Bill from his behavior/performance.  We might say: “Bill, everyone on the team really likes you.  We believe in you.  You’re an important part of our team, and we value you a great deal. However, we’re becoming concerned about your sales performance.  We know you’re concerned as well.  What steps can we take together to help improve your performance?”

In the example above, we first share with Bill that he is valued both as a person and a capable contributor.  He is immediately informed of our confidence in his ability to perform.  Yet, we must also ensure that his poor sales performance is addressed directly and specifically.  The critical take-away in this example is that we never degrade or demotivate Bill.  We only call out Bill’s poor performance. We never degrade him as a person.  Hence the critical importance of separating a person from their behavior.

Step # 3:  THE FINAL STEP – A PLAN OF ACTION MOVING FORWARD

It’s very important to develop an action plan that will allow the employee to improve his performance.  Without such a plan, a change in behavior (increased sales performance in this example) will not occur.  The improvement plan should originate directly from the individual, not the organization, nor a manager.  Having employees develop their own plan of action has the powerful impact of creating employee “buy-in.”  When an improvement plan instead comes from the organization or a manager, the employee has less vested interest in the plan’s success.  In this scenario, because Bill developed the plan himself (although perhaps facilitated by his manager), he will work infinitely harder to ensure it is ultimately successful.

Difficult conversations with employees need not be problematic. Follow these three easy steps:

  1. Ensure your intent is correct.
  2. Separate the employee from their behavior/performance
  3. Allow the employee to construct their own plan of action.

PS:  This method also works great at home, for modifying our kids’ behavior!